Digital Overcast

Writing Company Performance Review

Kien Lai | TOM 411 | 6/04/03 | California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Please respond to each of the following questions at whatever depth you choose

1. Present a critical review of the performance of your company in terms of what worked, what didn't work, and why?
A comparative analysis of color televisions shows that maintaining a selling price of $3000 at the end of the fourth quarter was effective because this was the price that the market was willing to bare. In other words, consumers were both able and willing to buy at the set price of $3000. The same can be said of digital televisions with a set price of $8000. Moreover, these prices were in line with our leading competitors. It is also worth noting that the high set price depicts the company's positioning of premium high quality televisions.

Our advertising budget was below the average of several of our competitors. The reason for the deficiency was a result of management's decision of maintaining market share as a result of the company's substandard financial position. Nevertheless, the advertising budget of digital televisions was on average of $150 more than color televisions to influence a shift in demand for the product. The strategy of our advertising seemed to have worked due to having zero finished product inventory at the end of each quarter.

Research and development remained consistent throughout the simulation. In relation to the amount of money that was invested into research and development, we saw a direct correlation to the efficiency of producing television sets in both color and digital. Although many factors can be attributed to the efficiency of production, it can be said that research and development was one of the primary contributors in increasing overall efficacy. At the end of the fourth quarter, production efficiency stood at .05 for color and .08 for digital. Sales commission and market allocation remained consistent throughout the simulation. The reason why these areas were not altered was because they met our expectations of not having any finished inventory at the end of each quarter. The market allocation was distributed based on the locations with the highest to lowest demand.

The one area of the simulation that did not work for our team or had the most difficulty with was balancing production workers with the total amount of raw materials ordered. The excel spreadsheet was helpful, but we continued to struggle with this area because several factors influenced total production and the required man power necessary in achieving our goals. Such factors include the wages paid, budget of research and development, training provided to employees, profit sharing, and restrictions on the amount of raw materials each group can order each quarter.

2. If you were to start over again with the same company and team, what basic changes would you make?
Our group, based on board meetings, would not hire as many production employees. The money saved in salaries would be reallocated in trying to increase efficiencies in both production and operations. Another area we would change would be not issue as many shares as we did because it would likely reduce its value. More importantly, we would have purchased more raw materials even if it exceeded the production capacity. We learned that it was better to have raw materials left over at the end of the quarter than none at all. We also found out that having raw materials left over at the end of the quarter boosts the value of our stock price.

3. Discuss the learning you experienced from interacting with the web based strategic Management Analysis Model.

4. (optional) How could this learning experience have been improved from your point of view?
Some of the results after each quarter was run gave irrational information. Comparing the information to other teams shows that the simulation can be altered to calculate favorable results. Also, demand in each region can be exceed, which puts other teams at a disadvantage if unaware of this possibility. Improving these areas and informing the teams of these issues before playing would make the simulation less of a drawback.